pcs
07-08 08:46 AM
We need to expose all these attorneys ( read blood suckers)
It can be easily done on IV
It can be easily done on IV
wallpaper Best Nature HD Wallpaper
velan
04-30 10:35 AM
Good find.
gchandu
07-20 12:27 PM
Yes it happened to me, I didnt loose my internet connection that time but simply forget to change address on my pending 485 applications :)
Called the USCIS customer service center and one of the representative did update manually. Yes you can also do that for sure
Thanks
Chandu
Hi there,
I changed my address using the online facility provided by USCIS by filling out the AR-11 form. I got the confirmation for that. After that when I started to change for pending petitions (I-485), lost my internet connection. I could not go back to that part again.
I checked all the FAQ's etc but could not find a link that would explain how to change only the pending petitions, since AR-11 was already changed.
Please let me know if anybody was in the similar situation.
Thank you!!!
Called the USCIS customer service center and one of the representative did update manually. Yes you can also do that for sure
Thanks
Chandu
Hi there,
I changed my address using the online facility provided by USCIS by filling out the AR-11 form. I got the confirmation for that. After that when I started to change for pending petitions (I-485), lost my internet connection. I could not go back to that part again.
I checked all the FAQ's etc but could not find a link that would explain how to change only the pending petitions, since AR-11 was already changed.
Please let me know if anybody was in the similar situation.
Thank you!!!
2011 desktop wallpaper nature hd.
vikasgarg24
07-12 10:09 AM
I think this become a problem for USCIS. might be they have some political pressure "not to allot Visa" and I dont think they will reversed. That I say American dadagiri. Rules for others only not for them
more...
ItIsNotFunny
04-19 10:33 AM
I totally agree with you. I hope date will move fast now since there is not enough people in 2002-2003. I hope this will be same for India and china too. Let`s hope for the best.
Nice poll. Can we have some modification as India and China has much difference in retrogression.
Nice poll. Can we have some modification as India and China has much difference in retrogression.
akizdetz
08-10 07:33 PM
USCIS is just fooling with you. :D you are an eastern European, right?
Hahaha, you're so funny! I guess you're the smart one from this forum, who thinks everybody loves your jokes! Grow up and get a job!
Hahaha, you're so funny! I guess you're the smart one from this forum, who thinks everybody loves your jokes! Grow up and get a job!
more...
jd123
05-16 11:53 AM
Hi,
I am on h4 visa now.It expires in Sep14,2011 .I have a company that wants to sponsor my H1 visa.the start date for the h1 visa would be 1st Oct,2011.
Does this mean that i will be out of status for Sep14-Sep30, will i have to file for my h4 renewal for that period.also,would it affect my new h1 petition.
Pls reply
I am on h4 visa now.It expires in Sep14,2011 .I have a company that wants to sponsor my H1 visa.the start date for the h1 visa would be 1st Oct,2011.
Does this mean that i will be out of status for Sep14-Sep30, will i have to file for my h4 renewal for that period.also,would it affect my new h1 petition.
Pls reply
2010 wallpaper of nature hd.
jkays94
06-21 06:46 PM
Thanks for reply
How can I find was it for misdemeanor or battery or felony?
I-485 part III would require you to answer 'yes' to the following question:
Have you ever, in or outside the United States:
been arrested, cited, charged, indicted, fined or imprisoned for breaking or violating any law or ordinance, excluding traffic violations?
Your best bet would be to conduct a background check in your state to see if it shows up on your record. You might want to consult a lawyer to see if this shows up in police or other records as well. Ironically I recently heard of a lawyer who recently advised someone to answer no to the question for a DWI since it was a 'traffic violation'. Note that if you answer yes you have the opportunity to explain on a separate piece of paper.
How can I find was it for misdemeanor or battery or felony?
I-485 part III would require you to answer 'yes' to the following question:
Have you ever, in or outside the United States:
been arrested, cited, charged, indicted, fined or imprisoned for breaking or violating any law or ordinance, excluding traffic violations?
Your best bet would be to conduct a background check in your state to see if it shows up on your record. You might want to consult a lawyer to see if this shows up in police or other records as well. Ironically I recently heard of a lawyer who recently advised someone to answer no to the question for a DWI since it was a 'traffic violation'. Note that if you answer yes you have the opportunity to explain on a separate piece of paper.
more...
vchip
08-24 09:47 AM
Any chances of Chances of Reconsidering this MEMO in the near future?
hair hd wallpaper nature
ajaykk
02-20 11:46 PM
Hi Gurus,
I and my wife work for same desi employer A, I am on H1 and wife on EAD, Now I have 2 offers, one with a different client on corp to corp (short term project) , another with a company B on W2 as contract (long term contract to hire and good pay).
I am more interested in accepting B's offer, but not sure on challenges with W2 as contract..is it a risk? What all do I need to be safe?
I am pretty confident that my employer A might not revoke my approved 140 as my wife is working there too.
I am totally confused and feel like on a X road with a close PD that might be current in few months.
Guru's , please advice.
AJ
I and my wife work for same desi employer A, I am on H1 and wife on EAD, Now I have 2 offers, one with a different client on corp to corp (short term project) , another with a company B on W2 as contract (long term contract to hire and good pay).
I am more interested in accepting B's offer, but not sure on challenges with W2 as contract..is it a risk? What all do I need to be safe?
I am pretty confident that my employer A might not revoke my approved 140 as my wife is working there too.
I am totally confused and feel like on a X road with a close PD that might be current in few months.
Guru's , please advice.
AJ
more...
amicable
06-21 06:12 PM
Hi, I recently got married to an American Citizen. I am Canadian citizen and on travel visa here. I filed my I-485 jut last week. My question is how long does it take to get permanent resident approval?
hot hair 3d nature wallpaper hd.
mbartosik
04-08 04:40 PM
If we were able to get the 3 year visa rather than 1 year extensions, then the main problem that the BEC give us in a practical sense is that if we change jobs we loss our priority dates.
So while the slow processing is an administration issue, the law could allow for priority dates to be kept something like this:
"If a labor application has been pending for longer than [some time] then as of [some date], the applicant immigrant is able to keep the priority date of the original labor application whether or not the application is later withdrawn or disapproved."
This in combination with 3 year extensions would give people freedom to either refile for PERM with same employer or move jobs and file for PERM with a new employer.
----
Another solution would be to allow DoL to accept a large fee for premium processing. Making the fee large would have the effect of not too many using it and thus not overwhelming DoL, but it also might generate sufficient income to apply more resources to the remaining outstanding applications, and benefiting all while being practical.
----
Please comment.
So while the slow processing is an administration issue, the law could allow for priority dates to be kept something like this:
"If a labor application has been pending for longer than [some time] then as of [some date], the applicant immigrant is able to keep the priority date of the original labor application whether or not the application is later withdrawn or disapproved."
This in combination with 3 year extensions would give people freedom to either refile for PERM with same employer or move jobs and file for PERM with a new employer.
----
Another solution would be to allow DoL to accept a large fee for premium processing. Making the fee large would have the effect of not too many using it and thus not overwhelming DoL, but it also might generate sufficient income to apply more resources to the remaining outstanding applications, and benefiting all while being practical.
----
Please comment.
more...
house girlfriend hd wallpaper
jsd123
04-21 09:42 AM
Hi, I have an approved I 140 (EB3) and my priority date is Nov 2007. I have a Canadian PR and my employer has agreed to let me work from our Canada Office. My question is, what should I do when/if my priority date becomes current while we are in Canada ? Should we come back to USA on visitors visa and apply for AOS or should be go for Consular Processing ? What are the pros and cons of each approach ?
tattoo dresses Hd Wallpapers Nature
micofrost
04-12 03:16 PM
Some where I read that there is no fee for renewal of AP. I am a Jul 07 filer and am not sure about this. Further already applied last for Advance parole and travelled till it got expired last month. I am applying for a new one again. So just wanted to know if I need to pay the fees $305.
So my questions are:
Does the July 07 filers need to send the cheque for $305
Should we also include Biometric fee of $80?
And how much time is it taking these days for AP/
Thanks in advance
There is a confusion regarding who pays what amount.
To avoid the filing date confusion, stick to this simple rule :
If you paid less than $400 ( I do not remeber the exact I-485 fees prior to the increase), then you need to pay for the Ap and EAD, the respective amount. If you paid more than $900 for your I-485 filing, then go file AP and EAD as much as you want.
For either case, you do not have to pay for the biometric. Biometric is only for EAD. Not for AP.
AP takes roughly 45 days.
Hope this is clear.
So my questions are:
Does the July 07 filers need to send the cheque for $305
Should we also include Biometric fee of $80?
And how much time is it taking these days for AP/
Thanks in advance
There is a confusion regarding who pays what amount.
To avoid the filing date confusion, stick to this simple rule :
If you paid less than $400 ( I do not remeber the exact I-485 fees prior to the increase), then you need to pay for the Ap and EAD, the respective amount. If you paid more than $900 for your I-485 filing, then go file AP and EAD as much as you want.
For either case, you do not have to pay for the biometric. Biometric is only for EAD. Not for AP.
AP takes roughly 45 days.
Hope this is clear.
more...
pictures Screen hd wallpaper nature
phillyag
05-19 03:10 PM
Yates memo dated May 12, 2005 - is it still valid and has there been any change to it since its out ?
I want to specifically focus on the following question:
Question 8. Can an alien port to self-employment under INA � 204(j)?
Answer: Yes, as long as the requirements are met. First, the key is whether the employment is in a "same or similar" occupational classification as the job for which the original I-140 petition was filed. Second, it may be appropriate to confirm that the new employer and the job offer are legitimate through an RFE to the adjustment applicant for relevant information about these issues. Third, as with any portability case, USCIS will focus on whether the I-140 petition represented the truly intended employment at the time of the filing of both the I-140 and the I-485. This means that, as of the time of the filing of the I-140 and at the time of filing the I-485 if not filed concurrently, the I-140 petitioner must have had the intent to employ the beneficiary, and the alien must have intended to undertake the employment, upon adjustment. Adjudicators should not presume absence of such intent and may take the I-140 and supporting documents themselves as prima facie evidence of such intent, but in appropriate cases additional evidence or investigation may be appropriate.
Does this still hold good ? And if it does can someone help me understand the criteria mentioned here. Too much of technical jargon
I want to specifically focus on the following question:
Question 8. Can an alien port to self-employment under INA � 204(j)?
Answer: Yes, as long as the requirements are met. First, the key is whether the employment is in a "same or similar" occupational classification as the job for which the original I-140 petition was filed. Second, it may be appropriate to confirm that the new employer and the job offer are legitimate through an RFE to the adjustment applicant for relevant information about these issues. Third, as with any portability case, USCIS will focus on whether the I-140 petition represented the truly intended employment at the time of the filing of both the I-140 and the I-485. This means that, as of the time of the filing of the I-140 and at the time of filing the I-485 if not filed concurrently, the I-140 petitioner must have had the intent to employ the beneficiary, and the alien must have intended to undertake the employment, upon adjustment. Adjudicators should not presume absence of such intent and may take the I-140 and supporting documents themselves as prima facie evidence of such intent, but in appropriate cases additional evidence or investigation may be appropriate.
Does this still hold good ? And if it does can someone help me understand the criteria mentioned here. Too much of technical jargon
dresses Caribe Nature HD Wallpapers
nk2006
05-12 01:57 PM
This really seems moving now. This may be the best time for the CIR to get passed in Senate. Conference may be different ball game but right now momentum is picking up and we (IV) has to do one last effort for our amendments.
Bush administration seems finally pushing hard on CIR:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/12/politics/main1614242.shtml
In NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/12/washington/12cnd-immig.html?hp&ex=1147492800&en=74b688ab8c164a63&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Bush administration seems finally pushing hard on CIR:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/12/politics/main1614242.shtml
In NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/12/washington/12cnd-immig.html?hp&ex=1147492800&en=74b688ab8c164a63&ei=5094&partner=homepage
more...
makeup Nature Full HD Wallpapers
srikanth003
02-28 10:47 AM
Thanks for your time and consideration. I was of the same opinion till now. But getting a little flustered lately, since my I-94 end date is 10-Jun-2011. I could not check back with my employer if they would be doing a premium one. Because once I raise any such queries, they might start the process now itself to avoid last minute submissions. Since there would be questions from them on why did I delay till now etc :(
Thats the fix I am in now.
Thats the fix I am in now.
girlfriend Nature HD wallpaper.
varshadas
03-26 06:11 AM
Hi Mikoo,
Thanks for your support on this. Please do not wait for people to meet the law makers. Go ahead and schedule your appointments and if no one responds, please go alone.
Thanks,
Varsha
Thanks for your support on this. Please do not wait for people to meet the law makers. Go ahead and schedule your appointments and if no one responds, please go alone.
Thanks,
Varsha
hairstyles nature wallpaper hd
gc_check
11-26 05:24 PM
Folks,
Got a question on surrendering I-94 when leaving USA. Do we just need to surrender the one issued in POE when coming to USA, or we need to surrender the I-94 that came with I-797 approval notice as well. I'm getting different opinion from different folks, Some say surrender only the White one issued in POE, few say surrender the one attached to I-797 approval notice as well. One friend of my mine, was asked to show the part attached to I-797 when he went for visa stamping and luckily he surrendered only the white one issued in POE and he did not surrender the one attached to I-797, so he had it with him.
Folks, please share your experience on this.
Sorry for the new thread, if this had been discussed on other threads as well.
Thanks,
Got a question on surrendering I-94 when leaving USA. Do we just need to surrender the one issued in POE when coming to USA, or we need to surrender the I-94 that came with I-797 approval notice as well. I'm getting different opinion from different folks, Some say surrender only the White one issued in POE, few say surrender the one attached to I-797 approval notice as well. One friend of my mine, was asked to show the part attached to I-797 when he went for visa stamping and luckily he surrendered only the white one issued in POE and he did not surrender the one attached to I-797, so he had it with him.
Folks, please share your experience on this.
Sorry for the new thread, if this had been discussed on other threads as well.
Thanks,
Blog Feeds
01-21 09:50 AM
Via The Economic Times (http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/travel/visa-power/us-violated-gats-by-increasing-h1b-l1-visa-fee/articleshow/7232740.cms)
An article in the Economic Times discusses the findings of a think-tank which indicated that the United States may have violated its obligations unde the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) by the newly implemented H and L fee increase for certain US Petitioners, "As a result, a WTO Member whose companies use H-1B and L-1 visas to perform services in the United States may challenge this provision at the World Trade Organization."
Read article (http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/travel/visa-power/us-violated-gats-by-increasing-h1b-l1-visa-fee/articleshow/7232740.cms)
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2011/01/13/us-violated-gats-by-increasing-h1b-l1-visa-fee---via-the-economic-times.aspx?ref=rss)
An article in the Economic Times discusses the findings of a think-tank which indicated that the United States may have violated its obligations unde the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) by the newly implemented H and L fee increase for certain US Petitioners, "As a result, a WTO Member whose companies use H-1B and L-1 visas to perform services in the United States may challenge this provision at the World Trade Organization."
Read article (http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/travel/visa-power/us-violated-gats-by-increasing-h1b-l1-visa-fee/articleshow/7232740.cms)
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2011/01/13/us-violated-gats-by-increasing-h1b-l1-visa-fee---via-the-economic-times.aspx?ref=rss)
maverick80
02-11 06:40 AM
I was talking to an attorney over the phone today and she said that PERM can be filed followed by 140 even if I am outside the country (working for an overseas department of the company) and I can come back on L1 / H1B, because GC is for future employment.
We were discuussing this because I was concerned that I may not be able to file H1 extension if the PERM is not filed 365 days before H1 extension.
This would be totally awesome coz I would love to work in some other country for a while.
Is this really true? (seems too good to be considering that everything else seems stacked up against us). Oh, if it matters to the discussion: I'm in EB2/India/retrogressed ad infinitum.
We were discuussing this because I was concerned that I may not be able to file H1 extension if the PERM is not filed 365 days before H1 extension.
This would be totally awesome coz I would love to work in some other country for a while.
Is this really true? (seems too good to be considering that everything else seems stacked up against us). Oh, if it matters to the discussion: I'm in EB2/India/retrogressed ad infinitum.
No comments:
Post a Comment